Group compensation overview and disclosure


The evolution of compensation practices and culture was placed firmly at the forefront of our commitments during 2012. It is widely perceived that certain aspects of compensation across the financial services industry should be addressed in the context of the current regulatory and macroeconomic environment, including impacts and lessons learned from the 2007 financial crisis. During the Investor Day in September 2012, we committed to taking specific and innovative actions in this regard which we have initiated, and in some instances already delivered, during the intervening period. For the first time we have asked senior professionals from outside the industry to assist us with their expertise and independent view in order to further improve our compensation practices. More information on the Independent Compensation Review Panel (ICRP) and how they have influenced compensation practices can be found in the subsequent sections of the report.

Our compensation governance structure, principles and policies have been the focus of continuous improvement in recent years. Many of these enhancements have been aligned with the introduction and oversight of new specific compensation regulations. In 2012, however, we have consciously taken the decision to step away from and go beyond the existing requirements with the clear intention to lead what is hoped will be a cultural change across the industry. These enhancements are addressed in the following report.

This section focuses on our compensation philosophy, policy and governance structures at a Group level and addresses the Section 7 group disclosure requirements under the InstitutsVergV. Specific information and disclosures with respect to the Management Board and other defined employee populations is included in subsequent sections.

Independent Compensation Review Panel

In September 2012 we announced our intention to convene an independent panel comprised of senior, highly regarded professionals with extensive experience from both industry and high public office. The clear intention was to seek an objective view of our existing compensation policies and processes, assess how these compared to industry best practice and formulate core principles and minimum standards for future structures and practices. Furthermore, we sought assistance in defining appropriate levels of transparency and disclosure in relation to compensation.

In October 2012 membership of the panel was announced.

Dr. Jürgen Hambrecht (Chair)

Michael Dobson

Morris W. Offit


 Dr. Michael Otto


Dr. Theo Waigel

– former CEO of BASF

– CEO of Schroders

– Chairman of Offit Capital and Independent Director of AIG

– Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Otto Group

– former Federal Minister of Finance for Germany

The panel followed a specific work plan leading up to the end of 2012 and continuing in 2013, working stringently towards their objectives and final recommendations. Preliminary conclusions are evident in the Compensation Report, particularly with regards to increased levels of transparency and disclosure but also the recommendation to adjust slightly the focus of compensation structures for the most senior employees and work towards more competitive levels of compensation deferred. The full recommendations from the panel will be finalised in 2013. Specific references to the panel recommendations are made in the following sections where applicable.

Compensation Philosophy and Principles

Deutsche Bank is a truly global organization operating in all regions across the world. We operate and strongly support a “One Bank” approach in relation to compensation to ensure employees are globally governed under the same principles, policy and procedures. This ensures a fully transparent, balanced and equitable approach to compensation.

The following core remuneration principles which were already introduced in 2010 apply globally and form the backbone of our compensation practices:

  • align compensation to shareholder interests and sustained firm-wide profitability, taking account of risk and the cost of capital;
  • comply with regulatory requirements;
  • maximize employee and firm performance;
  • attract and retain the best talents;
  • calibrate to different divisions and levels of responsibility;
  • have simple and transparent compensation design.

The principles are fully aligned with and build on our following core values which underpin and shape the work we do:

  • Performance;
  • Trust;
  • Teamwork;
  • Innovation;
  • Client Focus.

Complete focus on and dedication to clients is an imperative for building on and maintaining our success. Customers must be placed at the centre of our activities and drive all that we seek to achieve. Looking forward in 2013, this key objective will play an even greater role and will form one of the core principles reflected in new performance standards. Our Passion to Perform is driven by dedicated Client Focus and reinforced through delivering excellence and building long-term trusted relationships.

Within this wider context, we strongly believe that defined standards for compensation help to establish a direct relationship between the incentives for performance and the longer-term success of the firm. Compensation should reflect the success of the Bank as a whole but equally also account for the contributions made at a divisional and individual level. Discouragement of excessive risk taking forms an integral part of our compensation policy and this is both accompanied and supported by a management culture which is built on and guided by strong risk management, sound judgment, stable processes and effective controls.

We continually seek to reform and improve our compensation policies, practices and cultural direction through ongoing review processes. Our compensation policy is framed by the specific requirements of our home regulator, the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (“BaFin”). In particular, the InstitutsVergV which came into effect in 2010 is the primary compensation regulation requirement applicable to us on a Group-wide basis.

We are also subject to specific local regulations in certain jurisdictions and continue to pro-actively engage with regulators to ensure compliance with these to the extent they differ from the InstitutsVergV. A consistent global approach to compensation regulation appears unlikely in the near future, however, we continue to promote the merits of a level playing field across the industry in this respect. Strong, purposeful and targeted regulation is important to underpin sound risk management policies by firms.

Governance Structure

We operate a Global Reward Governance Structure within the German Two Tier Board Structure which oversees all aspects of compensation and compliance with the global regulatory requirements. For the Management Board, the Governance Structure is led solely by the Supervisory Board. The Senior Executive Compensation Committee (“SECC”) oversees compensation related decisions for all other employees in the Group. The SECC is specifically tasked by the Management Board to:

  • develop sustainable compensation principles and prepare recommendations on compensation and bonus levels including allocation to employees;
  • ensure appropriate compensation governance and oversight.

The SECC is co-chaired by Stefan Krause (Chief Financial Officer) and Dr. Stephan Leithner (Chief Executive Officer Europe (except Germany and UK), Human Resources, Legal & Compliance, Government & Regulatory Affairs), both of whom are members of the Management Board, and also includes senior employees from Risk, Finance and Human Resources. No employees aligned to any of our business divisions are members of the SECC in order to ensure its independence.

Global Reward Governance Structure

Global Reward Governance Structure (organigram)

The SECC is supported by two sub-committees, each responsible for specific aspects of our governance requirements.

The Group Compensation Oversight Committee (“GCOC”) reviews divisional compensation frameworks and ensures that the frameworks and practices comply with both our compensation principles and policies and all external regulatory requirements. This compliance includes taking into account sound measurements and metrics on: the financial performance of the Group and the respective divisions, the inherent risk profiles based on the different types of risk (i.e. operational, market, liquidity, reputational, regulatory and credit risk) and adherence to Compliance policies.

The GCOC has made a number of enhancements to the requirements it places upon the divisional compensation committees during 2012. These include the requirement, where applicable, for sub-divisional compensation frameworks in order to further integrate the use of business specific metrics and information into the compensation decision making process. Furthermore, the written documentation requirements required of senior managers to support Variable Compensation decisions have been significantly enhanced.

The Group Compensation Review Committee’s (“GCRC”) main responsibilities include operating an effective framework of compensation components and policies, approving new plans and changes to existing plans and reviewing our current and future liabilities related to compensation plans, in particular with regards to equity or equity-based components.