Executive Summary


The Global Economy

The global economy was impacted by several negative factors in 2011: rising commodity prices, mounting inflation, natural and nuclear disasters in Japan, political unrest in North Africa, debates on the debt ceiling in the U.S. and downgrading by rating agencies – but especially the sovereign debt crisis in Europe.

In 2011, the global economic growth slowed to an estimated 3.5 % after a solid growth of 5 % in 2010 that was driven by catch-up effects in the wake of the global economic crisis. The slowdown took place predominantly in the industrial countries, while growth continued nearly unabated in the emerging markets. The problems of structural adjustment in the industrial countries had apparently been masked in many cases by the massive monetary and fiscal policy measures introduced in 2008 and 2009, some of which only developed their full effect in 2010. As the economic stimulus measures expired, structural problems returned.

The U.S. economy, where continuing problems in the real estate and job markets slowed growth down from 3 % in 2010 to around 1.75 % in 2011, demonstrated this notably. In the wake of the tsunami last March and the nuclear catastrophe it unleashed in Fukushima, Japan’s economy was temporarily thrown into a recession by a negative supply shock and decreased on an annualized basis by around 0.75 %. The eurozone slid into a recession towards the end of the year due to the increasing uncertainty on the future development of the debt crisis and the retarding effects of the fiscal consolidation programs that were launched in many countries. As an annualized average, growth declined from 1.9 % in 2010 to around 1.5 % in 2011. Only the German economy grew strongly again at 3 %, versus 3.6 % in 2010. However, the sentiment clearly dampened here over the course of the year, in particular, due to the waning momentum in foreign trade.

The Banking Industry

In 2011, the economic environment for the banking industry was marked by a favorable first half and from summer onwards by a significant downturn as the European sovereign debt crisis worsened and economic activity declined more than expected.

Capital market businesses initially saw stable earnings and healthy client demand. This changed with the sovereign debt crisis in Europe spreading to Italy, Spain and other core countries during the third quarter. The uncertainty over debt sustainability, the magnitude of the economic downturn and worries about banks' excessive exposure to countries affected by the crisis paralyzed not only issuance activities, corporate acquisitions and trading in Europe but also the willingness of investors to provide long-term financing to the banking sector. Outside Europe, investment banking performance and banks’ term funding remained largely satisfactory. For the year as a whole, the global volume of equity issuance decreased significantly, while debt issuance was down only moderately compared to 2010; the market for M&A picked up slightly, and the syndicated loans business continued to recover.

European banks responded to the widespread drying-up of long-term refinancing sources and of the interbank market by accelerating the restructuring of investment banking activities, reducing risk positions, partially withdrawing from foreign markets and seeking greater recourse to funds made available by the European Central Bank. The change in the refinancing and liquidity situation manifested itself at year-end in the European Central Bank’s first-ever three-year tender operation with full allotment. In addition, the European Banking Authority also sought to restore confidence in the industry via two stress tests, increased capital requirements and improved disclosure of risk exposures in the countries affected by the crisis.

Asset management initially benefited in 2011 from the favorable market environment before revenues started to come under pressure with the decline of equity markets in August and higher volatility in the subsequent months. Investors reduced their holdings of equities and debt instruments perceived as relatively risky in favor of, for example, U.S. Treasuries and German Bunds in view of their reputation as safe havens. Banks’ commissions and fee income benefited from generally higher trading volumes which was offset by investors’ preference for rather low-margin products.

In line with the macroeconomic trends, lending volumes to private and business clients in the eurozone increased moderately in the first two quarters before leveling off towards year-end. Overall, lending volumes increased only insignificantly compared to the prior year. In the U.S., lending to private individuals stabilized in 2011, while corporate lending clearly returned to positive territory in the course of the year. Net interest income suffered from persistently very low interest rates in nearly all the industrialized countries. At the same time, loan loss provisions started to rise again in Europe; by contrast, they continued to fall in the U.S. As a result, banks in the eurozone (unlike U.S. banks) recently began to tighten their lending standards again.

Furthermore, European and U.S. banks posted contrasting profit performances: while banks in the U.S. continued to register sizeable gains and in fact approached the record levels of the pre-crisis period, the banks in Europe experienced declines in net income on an already only moderate performance in the prior year. A few major banks sustained (further) losses in this still relatively favorable economic environment.

The past year provided greater visibility on the new legal architecture for the financial markets. Initiatives were launched in the European Union and the U.S. to transpose the provisions of Basel 3 into national law. In Europe, banks were required for the first time to comply with the requirements of Basel 2.5, as set out in the adapted Capital Requirements Directive (“CRD III”), in particular with its higher risk weights for re-securitizations and trading assets. Furthermore, the global banking supervisors released a draft document detailing the implementation of higher capital requirements for systemically relevant banks as well as a list of the institutions concerned including Deutsche Bank. In the U.S., the various financial regulators – in particular the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the SEC and the CFTC – introduced rules which cast the underlying legislation of the Dodd-Frank Act adopted in 2010 in concrete regulations for the financial industry. The United Kingdom ventured into new territory with the Vickers Commission’s proposals on the organizational separation of lending and deposit-taking businesses with private and business clients from the rest of a bank’s activities. Finally, the discussion about the introduction of a financial transaction tax intensified at the European level.

In 2011 the German legislator amended the Securities Trading Act with a view to strengthen investor protection and market transparency and the European Commission proposed an overhaul of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive to enhance investment advice to retail customers, market transparency and the organization of securities services providers.

Deutsche Bank

The market environment in 2011 was very difficult. A favourable development of the markets in the first six months was followed by very challenging circumstances in the second half of 2011. The sovereign debt crisis in Europe led to mounting uncertainty in markets around the world and to reluctance to do business among clients, above all in Europe, but it also and most recently had an impact on the economy in several countries.

Despite this challenging environment, we achieved solid results in 2011, generating a net income of € 4.3 billion (2010: € 2.3 billion) and income before income taxes of € 5.4 billion compared with € 4.0 billion in 2010 (which included a € 2.3 billion charge related to the Postbank acquisition). In our business segments within CIB and PCAM, we achieved an income before income taxes of € 6.6 billion. This compares to our original target of € 10 billion, which was based on certain assumptions about the operating environment, not all of which have materialized in 2011.

While our CB&S business showed a very strong performance in the first half of 2011, it could not achieve its full-year target as market conditions clearly deteriorated as a result of the continued European sovereign debt crisis and growing macroeconomic concerns in the second half of 2011. In addition, CB&S had to absorb € 1.0 billion of specific charges related to litigation and operational risks. On the other hand, our GTB and PCAM businesses achieved record results and, in aggregate, exceeded their targets. This performance included positive impacts from recent acquisitions, notably the full-year consolidation of Postbank, which also contributed to a more balanced earnings mix in the current year. In addition, the results in PBC reflect a € 0.2 billion net negative impact resulting from write-downs on Greek government bonds (€ 0.5 billion), partly offset by a one-time positive impact related to our investment in Hua Xia Bank (€ 0.3 billion).

Our 2011 results were also impacted by other significant factors. Firstly, we recognized impairments of approximately € 0.6 billion in relation to certain investments in CI. Secondly, our performance-related compensation expenses were significantly lower in 2011 reflecting lower results, especially in CB&S. Thirdly, we realized incremental efficiency savings of more than € 0.5 billion in 2011 through the execution of our Complexity Reduction Program, bringing the total efficiency savings of this program, compared with the respective 2009 cost base, to € 1.1 billion by year-end 2011. Moreover, we have achieved additional savings from the further integration of CIB.

Overall, we considerably strengthened our capital position, liquidity reserves and refinancing sources and, thus, should be well prepared for further potential challenges caused by market turbulences and stricter regulatory rules. After applying the new rules of Basel 2.5 for the first time, our Tier 1 capital ratio was 12.9 % and our Core Tier 1 capital ratio was 9.5 % as of December 31, 2011. Risk-weighted assets at year-end 2011 were € 381 billion, versus € 346 billion at year-end 2010, largely due to an increase of € 54 billion attributable to the first-time implementation of the Basel 2.5 rules partly offset by management actions aimed at de-risking our business, mainly in CB&S. As of December 31, 2011, we also exceeded the capitalization requirements of the European Banking Authority, both in terms of the implementation date and our capitalization levels. Our liquidity reserves (excluding Postbank) were € 219 billion as of December 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010: € 150 billion).

The following table presents our condensed consolidated statement of income for 2011 and 2010.

in € m.

 

 

2011 increase (decrease) from 2010

(unless stated otherwise)

2011

2010

in € m.

in %

N/M – Not meaningful

1

After provision for credit losses.

Net interest income

17,445

15,583

1,862

12

Provision for credit losses

1,839

1,274

565

44

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

15,606

14,309

1,297

9

Commissions and fee income

11,544

10,669

875

8

Net gains (losses) on financial assets/liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

3,058

3,354

(296)

(9)

Net gains (losses) on financial assets available for sale

123

201

(78)

(39)

Net income (loss) from equity method investments

(264)

(2,004)

1,740

(87)

Other income (loss)

1,322

764

558

73

Total noninterest income

15,783

12,984

2,799

22

Total net revenues1

31,389

27,293

4,096

15

Compensation and benefits

13,135

12,671

464

4

General and administrative expenses

12,657

10,133

2,524

25

Policyholder benefits and claims

207

485

(278)

(57)

Impairment of intangible assets

29

(29)

N/M

Restructuring activities

N/M

Total noninterest expenses

25,999

23,318

2,681

11

Income before income taxes

5,390

3,975

1,415

36

Income tax expense

1,064

1,645

(581)

(35)

Net income

4,326

2,330

1,996

86

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

194

20

174

N/M

Net income (loss) attributable to Deutsche Bank shareholders

4,132

2,310

1,822

79

Key figures comparison

Compare key figures of the past years. more

Signs and Symbols
  • Save section as pdf file
  • Save table as xls file
  • Print page
  • Add file to file library
  • Glossary
  • Link to a page outside of this report
  • Link to a page within this report
  • Compare to 2009
  • Corresponding page at the PDF version of this report
Help

Explanations to make the best possible use of the information provided and the various service features can be found here.

Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2011

Feedback