Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements as of 31 December 2007, which were audited by KPMG Deutsche Treuhand AG.

Substantially all of our businesses are subject to the risk that market prices and rates will move and result in profits or losses for us. We distinguish among four types of (Glossary)market risk:

  • Interest rate risk ;
  • Equity price risk;
  • Foreign exchange risk; and
  • Commodity price risk.

The interest rate and equity price risks consist of two components each. The general risk describes value changes due to general market movements, while the specific risk has issuer-related causes (including credit spread risk).

Market Risk Management Framework

We assume market risk in both our trading and our nontrading activities. We assume risk by making markets and taking positions in debt, equity, foreign exchange, other securities and commodities as well as in equivalent (Glossary)derivatives.

We use a combination of risk sensitivities, (Glossary)value-at-risk, stress testing and (Glossary)economic capital metrics to manage (Glossary)market risks and establish limits. Economic capital is the metric we use to describe and aggregate all our market risks, both in trading and nontrading portfolios. Value-at-risk is the primary metric we use in the management of our trading market risks. Our risk sensitivities, value-at-risk, stress testing and economic capital metrics also reflect basis risks arising from our trading activities.

Our Management Board and Risk Executive Committee, supported by Market Risk Management, which is part of our independent legal, risk & capital function, set a Group-wide (Glossary)value-at-risk limit for the market risks in the (Glossary)trading book. Market Risk Management sub-allocates this overall limit to our group divisions. Below that, limits are allocated to specific business lines and trading (Glossary)portfolio groups and geographical regions.

Our value-at-risk disclosure for the trading businesses is based on our own internal value-at-risk model. In October 1998, the German Banking Supervisory Authority (now the BaFin) approved our internal value-at-risk model for calculating the regulatory market risk capital for our general and specific market risks. Since then the model has been periodically refined and approval has been maintained.

Our value-at-risk disclosure is intended to ensure consistency of market risk reporting for internal risk management, for external disclosure and for regulatory purposes. The overall value-at-risk limit for our Corporate and Investment Bank Group Division started 2007 at € 90 million and was increased to € 105 million on February 27, 2007. The overall value-at-risk limit for our consolidated Group trading positions was € 92 million at the start of 2007 and was increased to € 110 million on February 27, 2007 (with a 99% (Glossary)confidence level, as described below, and a one-day holding period).

Specifics of Market Risk Reporting under German Banking Regulations

German banking regulations stipulate specific rules for market risk reporting, which concern in particular the consolidation of entities, the calculation of the overall market risk position, as well as the determination of which assets are trading assets and which are nontrading assets:

  • CONSOLIDATION. For German bank-regulatory purposes we consolidate all subsidiaries in the meaning of the German Banking Act that are classified as banking institutions, financial services institutions, financial enterprises or bank service enterprises. We do not consolidate insurance companies or companies outside the finance sector.
  • OVERALL MARKET RISK POSITION. We do not include in our market risk disclosure the foreign exchange risk arising from currency positions that German banking regulations permit us to exclude from market risk reporting. These are currency positions which are fully deducted from, or covered by, equity capital recognized for regulatory reporting as well as participating interests, including shares in affiliated companies that we record in foreign currency and value at historical cost (structural currency positions). Our largest structural currency positions arise from our investments in entities located in the United States.
  • DEFINITION OF TRADING ASSETS AND NONTRADING ASSETS. The regulatory definition of trading book and (Glossary)banking book assets generally parallels the definition of trading and nontrading assets under (Glossary)IFRS. However, due to specific differences between the regulatory and accounting framework, certain assets are classified as trading book for market risk reporting purposes even though they are nontrading assets under IFRS. Conversely, we also have assets that are assigned to the banking book even though they are trading assets under IFRS.