Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements as of 31 December 2007, which were audited by KPMG Deutsche Treuhand AG.

(Glossary)Credit risk arises from all transactions that give rise to actual, contingent or potential claims against any counterparty, borrower or obligor (which the Group refers to collectively as “counterparties”). This is the largest single risk the Group faces.

The Group distinguishes among three kinds of credit risk:

  • Default risk is the risk that counterparties fail to meet contractual payment obligations.
  • (Glossary)Country risk is the risk that the Group may suffer a loss, in any given country, due to any of the following reasons: a possible deterioration of economic conditions, political and social upheaval, nationalization and expropriation of assets, government repudiation of indebtedness, exchange controls and disruptive currency depreciation or devaluation. Country risk includes transfer risk, which arises when debtors are unable to meet their obligations owing to an inability to transfer assets to nonresidents due to direct sovereign intervention.
  • Settlement risk is the risk that the settlement or clearance of transactions will fail. It arises whenever the exchange of cash, securities and/or other assets is not simultaneous.

The Group manages credit risk in a coordinated manner at all relevant levels within the organization. This also holds true for complex products which the Group typically manages within a framework established for trading exposures. The following principles underpin the Group’s approach to (Glossary)credit risk management:

  • In all group divisions, consistent standards are applied in the respective credit decision processes.
  • The approval of credit limits for counterparties and the management of the Group’s individual credit exposures must fit within the Group’s (Glossary)portfolio guidelines and credit strategies.
  • Every extension of credit or material change to a credit facility (such as its tenor, collateral structure or major covenants) to any counterparty requires credit approval at the appropriate authority level.
  • The Group assigns credit approval authorities to individuals according to their qualifications, experience and training, and the Group reviews these periodically.
  • The Group measures and consolidates all credit exposures to each obligor on a global consolidated basis that applies across the consolidated Group. The Group defines an “obligor” as a group of individual borrowers that are linked to one another by any of a number of criteria the Group has established, including capital ownership, voting rights, demonstrable control, other indication of group affiliation; or are jointly and severally liable for all or significant portions of the credit the Group has extended.

CREDIT RISK RATINGS

A primary element of the credit approval process is a detailed risk assessment of every credit
(Glossary)exposure associated with a counterparty. The Group’s risk assessment procedures consider both the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the risks related to the specific type of credit facility or exposure. This risk assessment not only affects the structuring of the transaction and the outcome of the credit decision, but also influences the level of decision-making authority required to extend or materially change the credit and the monitoring procedures the Group applies to the ongoing exposure.

The Group has its own in-house assessment methodologies, scorecards and (Glossary)rating scale for evaluating the creditworthiness of its counterparties. The Group’s granular 26-grade rating scale, which is calibrated on a (Glossary)probability of default measure based upon a statistical analysis of historical defaults in the Group’s portfolio, enables the Group to compare its internal ratings with common market practice and ensures comparability between different sub-portfolios of the Group. Several default ratings therein enable the Group to incorporate the potential recovery rate of defaulted (Glossary)exposure.

The Group generally rates all its credit exposures individually. When the Group assigns its internal risk ratings, the Group compares them with external risk ratings assigned to the Group’s counterparties by the major international rating agencies, where possible.

Credit Limits

Credit limits set forth maximum credit exposures the Group is willing to assume over specified periods. They relate to products, conditions of the exposure and other factors.

Monitoring Default Risk

The Group monitors all credit exposures on a continuing basis using several risk management tools. The Group also has procedures in place to identify, at an early stage, credit exposures for which there may be an increased risk of loss. Counterparties that, on the basis of the application of the Group’s risk management tools, demonstrate the likelihood of problems, are identified well in advance so that the Group can effectively manage the credit exposure and maximize the recovery. The objective of this early warning system is to address potential problems while adequate alternatives for action are still available. This early risk detection is a tenet of the Group’s credit culture and is intended to ensure that greater attention is paid to such exposures. In instances where the Group has identified counterparties where problems might arise, the respective exposure is placed on a watchlist.

MAXIMUM EXPOSURE TO CREDIT RISK

The following table shows the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk without taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements that do not qualify for offset.

in € m.1

Dec 31, 2007

Dec 31, 2006

1

All amounts at carrying value unless otherwise indicated.

2

Excludes equities and other equity interests.

3

Financial guarantees, other credit related contingent liabilities and irrevocable lending commitments (including commitments designated under the (Glossary)fair value (Glossary)option) are reflected at notional amounts.

Due from banks

7,458

5,821

Interest earning deposits with banks

21,615

19,199

Central bank funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements

13,597

14,265

Securities borrowed

55,961

62,943

Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss2

1,343,257

974,927

(Glossary)Financial assets available for sale2

32,850

29,042

Loans

200,597

180,194

Other assets subject to credit risk

84,761

54,678

Financial guarantees and other credit related contingent liabilities3

49,905

43,047

Irrevocable lending commitments and other credit related (Glossary)commitments3

128,511

141,331

Maximum exposure to credit risk

1,938,511

1,525,447

COLLATERAL HELD AS SECURITY

The Group regularly agrees upon collateral in the lending contracts to be received from borrowers. Collateral is security in the form of an asset or third-party obligation that serves to mitigate the inherent risk of credit loss in an exposure, by either substituting the borrower default risk or improving recoveries in the event of a default. While collateral can be an alternative source of repayment, it does not mitigate or compensate for questionable reputation of a borrower or structure.

The Group segregates collateral received into the following two types:

  • Financial collateral which substitutes the borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligation under the legal contract and as such is provided by third parties. Letters of Credit, insurance contracts, received guarantees and risk participations typically fall into this category.
  • Physical collateral which enables the Group to recover all or part of the outstanding exposure by liquidating the collateral asset provided, in cases where the borrower is unable or unwilling to fulfill its primary obligations. Cash collateral, securities (equity, bonds), inventory, equipment (plant, machinery, aircraft) and real estate typically fall into this category.

Additionally the Group is actively managing the credit risk of the Group’s loans and lending-related commitments. A specialized unit within the Group, the Loan Exposure Management Group, is concentrating on two primary initiatives within the credit risk framework to further enhance risk management discipline, improve returns and use capital more efficiently:

  • to reduce single-name and industry credit risk concentrations within the credit portfolio, and
  • to manage credit exposures actively by utilizing techniques including loan sales, (Glossary)securitization via collateralized loan obligations, default insurance cover as well as single-name and
    (Glossary)portfolio (Glossary)credit default swaps.

To better manage the Group’s (Glossary)derivatives-related credit risk, the Group enters into collateral arrangements that generally provide risk mitigation through periodic (usually daily) margining of the covered portfolio or transactions and termination of the master agreement if the counterparty fails to honor a collateral call.

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

Significant concentrations of credit risk exist where the Group has material exposures to a number of counterparties with similar economic characteristics, or who are engaged in comparable activities, where these similarities may cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be affected in the same manner by changes in economic or industry conditions. A concentration of credit risk may also exist at an individual counterparty level.

In order to monitor and manage credit risks, the Group uses a comprehensive range of quantitative tools and metrics. Credit limits relating to counterparties, countries, products and other factors set the maximum credit exposures that the Group intends to incur.

The Group’s largest concentrations of credit risk with loans are in Western Europe and North America, with a significant share in households. The concentration in Western Europe is principally in the Group’s home market Germany, which includes most of the mortgage lending business.

CREDIT QUALITY OF ASSETS THAT ARE NEITHER PAST DUE NOR IMPAIRED

The following table breaks down the Group’s corporate credit exposure, according to the creditworthiness of the Group’s counterparties, for several of the main exposure categories subject to credit risk. For the Group’s derivatives-related credit risk, the Group regularly seeks the execution of master agreements (such as the International (Glossary)Swaps and Derivatives Association’s master agreements for
(Glossary)derivatives) with the Group’s clients. A master agreement allows the netting of obligations arising under all of the derivatives transactions that the agreement covers upon the counterparty’s default, resulting in a single net claim against the counterparty (called “close-out netting”). For parts of the Group’s derivatives business, the Group also enters into payment (Glossary)netting agreements under which the Group sets off amounts payable on the same day in the same currency and in respect to all transactions covered by these agreements, reducing the Group’s principal risk. For the (Glossary)OTC derivative credit exposure in the following table, the Group has applied netting only when the Group believes it is legally enforceable for the relevant jurisdiction and counterparty.

Corporate credit exposure credit risk profile by credit-worthiness category
in € m.

Loans1

Irrevocable lending Commitments2

Contingent liabilities

OTC derivatives3

Total

Dec 31,
2007

Dec 31,
2006

Dec 31,
2007

Dec 31,
2006

Dec 31,
2007

Dec 31,
2006

Dec 31,
2007

Dec 31,
2006

Dec 31,
2007

Dec 31,
2006

1

Includes (Glossary)IFRS impaired loans mainly in category CCC and below amounting to € 1.5 billion as of December 31, 2007 and € 1.6 billion as of December 31, 2006.

2

Includes Irrevocable Lending Commitments related to the consumer credit exposure of € 2.7 billion as of both, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

3

Includes the effect of master agreement netting for OTC derivatives where applicable.

AAA–AA

22,765

20,225

28,969

34,172

7,467

5,774

54,164

28,255

113,366

88,427

A

30,064

17,615

31,087

38,356

15,052

13,548

21,092

16,238

97,294

85,757

BBB

30,839

31,893

35,051

34,986

13,380

13,364

8,706

7,194

87,975

87,436

BB

26,590

26,301

25,316

26,536

9,146

6,170

10,018

5,351

71,069

64,358

B

6,628

5,271

7,431

6,254

4,252

3,589

2,601

1,060

20,912

16,175

CCC and below

3,342

5,188

657

1,027

609

602

1,300

114

5,908

6,931

Total

120,228

106,494

128,511

141,331

49,905

43,047

97,881

58,212

396,525

349,084

The table below presents the total consumer credit exposure split by German and non-German exposure.

 

Total exposure

in € m.

Dec 31, 2007

Dec 31, 2006

1

Includes IFRS impaired loans amounting to € 1.1 billion as of December 31, 2007 and € 1.1 billion as of December 31, 2006.

Consumer credit exposure Germany:

56,504

53,446

Consumer and small business financing

14,489

12,261

Mortgage lending

42,015

41,185

Consumer credit exposure outside Germany

23,864

20,253

Total consumer credit exposure1

80,368

73,699

The following table provides an overview of nonimpaired Troubled Debt Restructurings representing the Group’s renegotiated loans that would otherwise be past due or impaired.

in € m.

Dec 31, 2007

Dec 31, 2006

Troubled Debt Restructurings not impaired

43

43

The following table breaks down the nonimpaired past due loan exposure carried at amortized cost according to the past due status.

in € m.

Dec 31, 2007

Dec 31, 2006

Loans less than 30 days past due

8,644

6,268

Loans 30 or more but less than 60 days past due

1,511

1,093

Loans 60 or more but less than 90 days past due

502

280

Loans 90 days or more past due

333

352

Total loans past due but not impaired

10,990

7,993

The following table shows the aggregated value of collateral – with fair values capped at transactional outstandings – the Group held against the Group’s loans past due but not impaired.

in € m.

Dec 31, 2007

Dec 31, 2006

Financial collateral

915

292

Physical collateral

3,724

3,577

Total capped (Glossary)fair value of collateral held for loans past due
but not impaired

4,639

3,869

IMPAIRED LOANS

Under IFRS the Group considers loans to be impaired when the Group recognizes objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred. While the Group assesses the impairment for the Group’s corporate credit exposure individually, the Group considers smaller-balance, standardized homogeneous loans to be impaired once the credit contract with the customer has been terminated.

The following table shows the breakdown of the Group’s impaired loans between German and non-German borrowers based on the country of domicile of borrowers.

in € m.

Dec 31, 2007

Dec 31, 2006

Individually evaluated impaired loans:

 

 

German borrowers

957

1,194

Non-German borrowers

559

431

Total individually evaluated impaired loans

1,516

1,625

Collectively evaluated impaired loans:

 

 

German borrowers

817

852

Non-German borrowers

312

241

Total collectively evaluated impaired loans

1,129

1,092

Total impaired loans

2,645

2,717

The following table shows the aggregated value of collateral – with fair values capped at transactional outstandings – the Group held against impaired loans.

in € m.

Dec 31, 2007

Dec 31, 2006

Financial collateral

26

55

Physical collateral

874

757

Total capped fair value of collateral held for impaired loans

899

812

The following table shows the aggregated value of collateral the Group obtained on the balance sheet during the reporting period by taking possession of collateral held as security or by calling upon other credit enhancements.

in € m.

2007

2006

Commercial real estate

1

Residential real estate

533

15

Other

723

Total collateral obtained during the reporting period

1,255

16

Collateral obtained is made available for sale in an orderly fashion or through public auctions, with the proceeds used to repay or reduce outstanding indebtedness. Generally the Group does not occupy obtained properties for the Group’s business use.

The residential real estate collateral obtained in 2007 includes € 396 million in relation to residential real estate obtained and held by securitization trusts which are consolidated for (Glossary)IFRS but where the bank does not hold the majority stake nor has control. Instead the Trustee, on behalf of all note and shareholders, controls the foreclosure and sale process. The collateral obtained by these trusts as reported above represent year-end balances. The bulk of other collateral obtained relates to one individual structured transaction where the Group originally held debt securities as collateral and has subsequently sold off the majority of collateral as of year-end.